IH-666-XHS - 25oz Selvedge Denim Slim Straight Cut Jeans - Indigo
-
Amen to that.
-
I must say that I'm perplexed by the sizing advice that's been handed out in this thread. Why do people recommend going TTS when these are a full inch over the tagged size? It's not as if the 25oz denim is so inhospitable to human life that it can't be a bit snug against your skin.
I'm a true 36 and purchased a size 36 at the beginning of the year before the most recent run, which came in size 35. I've had other slim jeans that were oversized around an inch in the waist, but fit fine otherwise when belted. These just didn't work for me though; oversized in the waist, hips, and legs. I'm not a scrawny guy either. I've got wide, blocky hips and fairly thick legs. I flipped these for a healthy percentage of their original price and moved on.
The recent sale tempted me to give this cut another go, so I sized down to a 35 and I couldn't be happier with the fit. Everything that was wrong with the first pair is spot on with these. I may be suffering from abrasions once I start moving about, but at the moment, I'm pretty sure that I made the right decision.
-
The usual advice is to measure your best fitting pair and compare those sizes to the shops chart. Then chose which size is closest to your pair. That would be your TTS fit. Not whatever you think your waist size is
-
Agreed
-
I thought I would offer an update on my break-in process. On Wednesday and Thursday, I put the jeans on when I got home from work, so I only got a few hours of wear in, but they became much easier to button / unbutton in that brief time. They're obviously stiff, but I didn't find them uncomfortable at all.
On Friday, I put them on after work, slept in them (intentionally), woke up on Saturday and went to meet my fiancé in Manhattan. Well… after walking around the city all day, I can say this: the struggle is real, my friends. I'm sporting some battle scars in the form of cuts and scrapes on the back side of my knees. The friction in that crease was noticeably worse than anywhere else, in that it was noticeable at all.
I researched these considerably before I bought them so I knew might encounter some break-in pain, but what doesn't really translate from other people's experiences is how truly exceptional these jeans are. They are rugged, but also comfortable and warm (this was appreciated on the especially windy city blocks).
I couldn't be happier with this purchase.
-
PSB…good choice...at 10 months mine are as comfy as sweat pants....very supple. enjoy your evo.
-
Agreed have worn mine all week
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD
-
I felt like I was taking crazy pills, so I searched Superfuture and found multiple people who say that TTS should always refer to the tagged size and not the measurements. I guess there's not a universal definition for this term.
Just saw that and had to reply. It's simple: Size charts are there for a reason. I know that the perfect waist for me is 35" so I choose a raw pair with a mesured 35-36" waist presoak or 34-35" in a onewash or sanforized model. That means TTS for me and I think all other forum people I know. When choosing said 35" means to pick up a tagged 32 (I did that) or a tagged 36 (did that too) - I don't care. Confusion might come in here:
- it's a difference wether you go TTS (as a person)
- or if jeans fit TTS (as product). If a jeans fits TTS you are right and have to assume that a tagged 34 equals a 34 waist. But it's mostly used in "I went TTS in these" and that means you get your right size, regardless of the number on the tag.
-
I am one of those who refer to the tag size.
So if I am size 35 waist and a pair tagged with 33 but measures 35", then I say that I sized down 2. Just beause the jeans run big in the first place.But like MaxP said: Size charts are there for a reason
-
I wish I would have sized up (or would it be TTS?) on these. It's hard to wear them a whole day.
-