ULTRA HEAVY RAW - IH-1955-UHR, IH-666-UHR and IH-634-UHR
-
Nice!!!
-
Another question if I may. Not sure what thread is best so keeping it here.
UHR is out due to brightness. I now really want some jeans in the XHS. Unfortunately the tighter leg on the 634XHS (versus the 634S) makes them a no no.
My 634S-GR are pretty much the perfect fit for me and the 634S are good but a little tighter than I would like in the thigh. Based on the measurement guides on the website I reckon sizing down one to a 33 tag pair of 1955s would be good but then I lose out on the XHS.
So, my question, will you be making the 1955 with the XHS material?
-
Thanks seanocono but I already wear a belt with the 34s because I like a loose fit. 35 would be too loose.
And thanks Giles but they're even smaller in the thigh so a no go. Need to sell my (practically unworn) Devils Left Hand 34s at some point because the thigh is too tight. Just can't bring myself to do it cos they are so purdy.
-
If you're big in the thigh then the 1955 is a great cut. This is based on my extensive research lasting all of two days.
They're a bit more tapered than the 634, and the rise is higher. If you can cope with both of those then you'll get on with them. Mine are very comfortable to wear. There's a fitpic in the IH-1955-UHR thread.
I'd go for the UHRs over the 21oz version, but I'm horribly biased. They'll fade faster, which will get them through the bright blue phase, and it's a more interesting fabric.
-
Incredible Denim! Will def size up, über stiff Denim-porn. My fingers still hurt haha
-