Viberg
-
@tod:
Sounds a little like the 2040 last…
not sure if this is news to people or not, but: "We are actually in the process of developing a new last that is a little rounder and more forgiving than the 2030, but with the same low profile." -guy
i for one think that sounds fecking fantastic!
yeah, but the 2040 last doesnt have the low profile that i personally really like on some boots
-
don't really know i tried with insole its tight but i can still feel the heel slips, its has the same lenght with my 1K and my cheaps is even bigger, maybe 6.5 will fit better or because its to heavy, lol.
Are the soles stiff? I think that can cause the heel slip until they break in and start to flex.
-
I like them cuffed Ben. They look good in fit pics. Yeah, 110 is wider in the back end. If your wider up front but want something a little less in the heal try the 2045. Only reason I sold my two tone 2045 is because they were a half size too big. I hate to much room up front!!
-
How does the 310 fit into this wideness up front and back discussion?
So, I've had 2045s, 310s, and now 110s, and here's my sense: 110s are widest throughout, but especially in the heel as people are saying. But it is also the lowest in the toe area, so in some ways it doesn't feel like your toes have the room you expect from a wide fit. 2045s seemed a bit narrow in the vamp and toes to me, but had a nice, rounded toe, and seemed normal (neither wide nor tight) in the heel. 310s seemed right in the middle, front and back. The sprung toe gives you lots of room in height, but I would not say they were wide in the toes – again, medium or even slightly narrow I would say.