IH-666S - The Devil's Fit Indigo - Slim Tapered

[StJamesRow]

Thanks Megatron. I thought about the 555 but am afraid, being unsanforized, these would be almost too slim. The hem is pretty small on the 34 (7.8") given that it would shrink smaller with a wash.

I keep eyeing the 666s to try a bit of a different cut. The site says they'll go down 1" in the waist and I think I'll be fine with a 34" waist, especially with a higher rise (11.5"). How much can I expect to see with the other measurements? For example, the hem on the 34 is 8.5" pre-wash; what should I expect after a soak?

[Giles]

1. The IH-555-01 are sanforised.  The IH-555-02 are unsanforised.

2. There are no IH-666S with a 34" waist at the moment - take a look at the sizing table

3. http://www.ironheart.co.uk/forum/index.php?topic=4549.msg373063#msg373063

[StJamesRow]

Thanks Giles.

I am seeing 7 pairs in stock for the 34 waist IH-666S? No 555-01 and 4 555-02.

[Megatron1505]

On the 555-02 you will get about an inch of shrink in the waist and length, but minimal shrink in the thigh, knee and hem, .25" at the most. They will also stretch back out a little with wear.

[Giles]

@StJamesRow:

Thanks Giles.

I am seeing 7 pairs in stock for the 34 waist IH-666S? No 555-01 and 4 555-02.

You are seeing 7 pairs of tag size 34 in the IH-666S.  Have you looked at the actual measurements under the "sizing" tab?

[nizzel55]

[501IH]

Trust you to come up with very enviable fades, nizzel! Have they stretched a lot? They look so loose for a 666 to me…I'd almost recommend a size down for the next one.

[nizzel55]

@501/IH I have sized down,  compared to these,  on my 666SII and 666UHR as I have lost some weight. 

[501IH]

Thanks, Nizzel. I will never become a good denim version of Sherlock Holmes, as weight loss naturally is the other possible explanation of a 666 fitting so, shall we say, comfortably.

[Bob]

I bought my 666s very roomy in the waist to ensure that the in the thighs would be right. (read, comfortable). For me, @rocket is THE fit hero. Effortless.

Ain't gotta be tight to be right.

@501/IH:

Thanks, Nizzel. I will never become a good denim version of Sherlock Holmes, as weight loss naturally is the other possible explanation of a 666 fitting so, shall we say, comfortably.

[rocket]

not sure if I would sign this, but Cheers for the flowers  @Bob

[Bob]

Your fit pics and WAYWT reveal a sense of style without succumbing to the skin-tight fad. @rocket:

not sure if I would sign this, but Cheers for the flowers  @Bob

[rocket]

my line was releated to the fit hero thing 

just do what you like and don't care a feck about what others might like or not…

[Bob]

Indeed, although I think a have a different/unpopular idea of what is flattering, primarily because I'm an old fart. My sons were doing the skinnies for a while, but I have them converted now and in "properly fitted" 634s. (My mother had us boys in Sears Toughskins, with preventative, iron-on knee patches.)

Ain't gotta be tight to be right.

[Bob]

Symptoms of "too tight":  Fly pulling open, stories of " fighting" with new jeans, and/or one's nuts shifted to one's abdomen.

[Giles]

Like in, "They were so tight, I had 3 adams apples?"…

[flatslide.th]

8 month

[twin]

Flatslide.th this is one of the best fits on this forum of the IH-666s jeans.
Also great fades keep on rocking them

[flatslide.th]

@twin:

Flatslide.th this is one of the best fits on this forum of the IH-666s jeans.
Also great fades keep on rocking them

thank bro.

[NorthernVictory]

Wow, crazy stacks.