IH-1955S
-
If you considering a 33 or 34… I would go 34 I have had both and the 33 due to the taper was a little smal in the hem around the ankle. These have a high rise and are ment to be worn above the hip bone with the front button just under the naval. At least that is how I like to wear them. Even though these are a full cut the silohuette appears slim due to the taper from knee to ankle.
I love my 634s they are one of the best Low to medium rise cuts, in fact I am going to get a size 35 in 634s.
The 1955s are not just a full cut 634S they wear different and have a different silohuette. That being said they are one of favorites cuts in the IH line. I never have to pull these up they ride perfect just above the hips and are very comfy... I will try to post some pics if this helps people with fitting questions.
-
No idea. I asked H for an estimated delivery date for all outstanding production orders yesterday…..
Any idea on these yet? The rise on these, after getting familiar with the MBB'S, might make these more attractive to more members…I'm in.
-
well well well, look who comes out of the woodwork when the 55's get talked about
-
There is no order form. There is a "tell me when back in stock" here…
-
Great fit advice Tinman. Still hoping at some point to see some pics.
Would it be possible to measure the distance between the rear pockets on the size 34 1955's?
I'm curious because I notice a huge difference between the rear pocket spacing between waist 33 and 34 on the 634s. The size 34 has rear pockets that are over 5" apart between the top corners, which looks odd on my frame. The 33 is much neater.
I have the feeling the top block of the 1955 will naturally pull the rear pockets closer together, but I can't quite tell from eyeballing it.
