In case it could be useful.

First time in UHR.  Was honestly hoping for a rougher hairier texture being loomstate but still very nice denim constructed to the Iron Heart level of quality that keeps me interested.

Ugh, this thing is hideous.

@AdamJ:

@Joe_M it's on our list of things we want to re-run but I would not expect a restock until next year I'm afraid

Thanks for the update, @AdamJ.

In case it could be useful.

First time in UHR.  Was honestly hoping for a rougher hairier texture being loomstate but still very nice denim constructed to the Iron Heart level of quality that keeps me interested.

Had to move my pair on because the sizing ended up not working out.  Love the denim though and am looking forward to the restock.  @Alex, any idea of when you might be getting more 18 oz Vintage across the cuts?  All good if there's no eta just yet….Thanks.

@sabergirl & @jerkules, thank you both for the very helpful feedback.

Hi, @neph93, nope definitely don't want shrinkage.  The size large thermal crew necks that I purchased fit me perfectly.  They're fantastic thermals from the fabric to the cut to the construction.  I just wasn't sure how well the loose stretchy cotton would hold up in a dryer or if it was best to lay flat to dry.  I've already washed one of them and errored on the side of caution laying it flat to dry, but it's good to know that they can handle a dryer.  Thanks for the info.

Hi @neph93, how do these guys handle up to a dryer?  I did see on the product page that they're one-washed so minimal or no shrinkage is to be expected but can the fabric really hold up to dryer or do you lay flat to be safe?

Thanks in advance man…

@BrianA:

I think I might just be a little bit confused because the front rise, back rise, and thighs are all comparably smaller in the 666s for the slubby denim (in at least the size 36 and 38 where I'm looking) though I keep reading on the forum and IH site that it's the 555 that's suppose to be slimmer cut in the top block. I'd prefer whichever is roomier and that's looking like the 555s (and not the 666s) but that seems wrong because the 555s are said to be the slimmest cut jeans you've got.  Is there something I'm missing or not understanding?

@BrianA, I can't compare the 555S-SLB to the 666S-SLB, but my slubby 555s definitely have a more roomie top block than both of my non-slubby 666s.  The taper from the thighs down though is much greater in my 555s.

@jmceachern:

Thanks Joe M. That’s helpful. Good to see the different cuts side by side.

Yeah I had the same thought, @jmceachern, the side-by-side visual comparisons are very useful.

@jmceachern:

@neph93:

@jmceachern:

Ok thanks.  Trying to figure out what size/ lot might work for me. First timer.  Leaning towards the 888.

Not easy, I remember myself.

If you have athletic thighs then then the 555 may not work. The taper from thigh to knee is pretty wicked, and the waist/thigh ratio is big (ie. the waist measures big but the thigh measures small).

If you want a smaller hem then the 777 doable, because it has a bigger knee measurement, so a little more room in the thigh.

The 888 is a bigger version of the 777 but with a different top block. Comfy relaxed fit but the taper and top block make it sharp still. You'd need a w34 in those.

The 634 and 666 are straight cuts, mixing tradition with a sharp modern edge. The 666 is slimmer with a trim top block.

If you haven't already, check here: https://www.ironheart.co.uk/content/our-cuts-jeans

Cool. Thanks for all that.

@jmceachern, in addition to the cut guide that @neph93 linked, I've also found the resource below to be especially helpful for reference from time to time when I forget how one cut is intended to measure up to another.

https://gallery.ironheart.co.uk/PHOTOS/Cut-Guides/Cut-Guide/