IH-666-UHR - Ultra Heavy - Devil's Fit (Slim Cut)

[Giles]

They become way more comfortable…100's of happy customers can't be wrong...

[el padre]

Yeah, they soften up quite quickly. My buttons were no problem after a couple of wears. They're warm, though, might want to factor that into your choice.

[1fookntitefd]

Thanks. I'll try to swing by SESF soon and try them on again. Not worried about it being too warm since I live in San Francisco and its pretty cool year round. I'll probably pick up either the UHR and the 666s. Does anyone own both and prefer one over the other? Which one is supposed to fade faster with better contrast?

[Giles]

The UHR will fade quicker and with with more contrast…

[Bingo Baller]

could anyone comment on the colour, are the UHR are lighter than 666s?

[Giles]

Yes

[zatenm]

Back in these bad boys after 3 months in my TW-634S..
I completely forgot what a kickass denim these are [emoji8]Pics hopefully soon!

[nizzel55]

Xpost from DWC thread.

2015-09-13 - 65 days (02 soak, 00 hand washes, 01 machine wash)

[louisbosco]

[Seul]

Like the belt - like the cuff - like the fades.

[louisbosco]

thank you good sir!

[el padre]

Feck aye, they're looking good

[harleysteen]

Hey all  - I am a huge fan of my my 4 year old pair of IH-666S-18oz.r's  - I own a pair of the SEXIH22-301s 21oz jean SelfEdge did a fews years back and they are tuff as all get out… but  a little too narrow from the calf down.  I may sell them -  so  I am wondering what differences that are notable would you say there are between theseUHR's, those and the IH-666S-21  ?  Am I to understand that these are raw version of the s-21's? These are relatively fast faders? Tough? Rigid?  Course? Slubb?  Thanks any and all !These may well be my next blue pair!

[harleysteen]

@Giles:

The UHR will fade quicker and with with more contrast…

Hiya Giles, best to you.

Will these be restocked? Or will they go extinct?  Thank you sir. (see my previous post if you have time )

[Giles]

http://www.ironheart.co.uk/forum/index.php?topic=8224.0

The UHR denim is a load gnarlier than the 21oz in every respect….

[Appfaff]

Literally took these out of the blue bag and my first though was : "how the f**k could anyone even sew these together????"

This materials is beyond what I even though was imaginable. Amazing work as always H, G and Crew.

For your amusement, here are some pre-soak fit pics. I couldn't even get the extra part of the leg over my feet lol

I turn my back for one second and the dogs go wild…

Soaked then for 3 hours and ran them through a cold light wash, no spin. They seriously didn't even move from their original position that I placed them in the washer.  I'll post some pics after the dry.  Can't wait to have my first date with the devil in the next few days… Too far?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Seul]

@Appfaff:

They seriously didn't even move from their original position that I placed them in the washer.

[Appfaff]

Post soak pics…

Probably gonna wear for a few weeks then pop these in for a warm wash. Got more than 1inch shrink in the waist, but none in the thigh and very little in he length. Love the fit, but I think it's a bit relaxed for what the cut was designed to be.

Cheers,

Adam

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Sam]

@Appfaff

You inspired me to take a photo of my 666-UHR's so i snapped a couple before i left work today. I feel i'm in the same boat as you… think i could get more shrinkage out of them. I only soaked mine for about half an hour and i was wearing them at the time as i lived in fear of them shrinking past my strength to get them back on.

no butt

[Appfaff]

Yours look great Sam!! I think a regular old wash would tighten them up a bit.

Btw, what sweat are you wearing?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk